Although I had intended to write about a few other photographers’ work as inspiration first, it seems high time now to describe how exactly I’m going about this project.
The still photograph has been with us for almost 200 years, and while there have been major developments in the way these still images are produced, the result hasn’t changed much at all. Photographs are still as compelling today in a 3D HD TV world as they were 200 years ago, and I reckon — importantly for this project — that they will still be compelling in 60 years’ time. So while it’s unlikely that in 60 years’ time I’ll be using a camera of the kind I’m using today to take photographs, I have no doubt that I’ll still be able to take photographs that look the same as ones taken today — or 200 years ago.
Back in the present: I’ll produce one portrait per participant. I’ve decided to use the square format for this main portrait. There’s nothing particularly unusual about the square format — a serious number of significant pictures have been taken peering through the square viewfinder of Hasselblads and Rolleiflexes, both very popular cameras in medium format. I used Hasselblads quite a bit when I studied photography a few years ago, sometimes retaining the square format in my prints and other times getting rid of it by cropping. (Though I loved the grain in some of my tougher classmates’ 35 mm Tri-X prints, I don’t think I ever quite grew comfortable with it in my own).
The choice of the square format for this project is mostly practical. A square picture is, a little obviously, neither portrait or landscape. This means simply that all ten pictures in this project will look the same.
I’ll be using my main camera, a Nikon D90. I love this camera. The first serious camera I owned was a Nikon D70, part of an early generation of non-professional SLRs. Since then, the market has expanded to include even smaller and lighter SLRs that require even less technical know-how, “below” cameras like the D90, and also “above” it, cameras like the Canon 5D and Nikon D700 — (slightly) smaller and (slightly) cheaper than the enormous, heavy and expensive top-of-the-line professional models. When it came to upgrade my almost five year old D70, I decided to stick right where I was in the range with its grandchild, the D90. I upgraded my main lens, too, to an 18-200 mm VR. Such a slow “super” zoom (11x) isn’t really regarded as a terribly serious lens (despite its €826 list price), but it’s a brilliantly useful lens. I reckon I spend most of my time around the 35-70 mm range (35 mm equivilant: 53-106 mm).
Unfortunately I haven’t been able to find a good way to compose with the square format using the D90. I don’t know exactly what format the grid lines in the viewfinder are in, but none of them forms a square (I tested). I tried various approaches with rubber bands across the lens hood, but this isn’t really compatible with a zoom lens. Taping over the sides of the screen and using Live View is one option, but I dislike composing this way. It seems a $150 KatzEye focusing screen is the only sensible way to acheive this. Unfortunately money is an object, so I’m just doing my best to keep the format in mind when I’m shooting.
An important part of the way I photograph is lighting with hotshoe flashes in the Strobist school. For these photos though, I don’t want the light to call attention to itself. The important part of these photos is their subjects, not the photos themselves. Just recently I bought a double-fold shoot-through umbrella. The soft light this produces would conceivably be useful for this goal, but I’m not yet used to it. I’m much more comfortable using the single flash bare.
I’ll be recording each participant talking a little about their lives in a way that lends itself to comparison. I’m using a handheld Sony voice recorder I’ve borrowed. I’ve only once before combined audio with still photography, and it’s something I’m looking forward to exploring further with this project. This recording will be combined with a few other shots for context using either Soundslides or iMovie.
In a later post I’ll talk more about how I’ll be presenting and publishing the photos, but for now that feels a bit moot before I’ve got any pictures to present.